Cruel

Already being a language lover, I found myself easily being drawn to a Latin based word. Based on what I already know about Latin based English words, I can infer that “cruel” appeared in English during the time of French Occupation on England. I am fascinated by all Romantic languages and their history. Therefore, I want to look further into the history of the word “cruel” and find out how such an extremely Latin word managed to change very little upon entering the English language. Of course, I wonder if such a strong word had ever any alternative meanings. Also, I have been pondering upon the previous masculinity or femininity of "cruel." I am so interested in this aspect of Old English that has since been lost. All in all, I am pretty excited to see where my search will take me.

The Lady and the Monster ...

When comparing the first edition of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, which showed her desire to accommodate the novel more to the liking of her husband Percy, to the later revised Frankenstein, Shelley’s “adolescence” and “initial ambivalence” is clear.

First time critics were quick to call out the “anonymous” writer’s novel as unorthodox in that it had no “conduct, manners, and morality.” Yet, if one were to compare Frankenstein to contemporary Promethean Imaginative works, it actually happens to be more conservative.

To the “young scholar,” it is pretty easy to miss Victor’s egotism and ambition, which can come off as being “curious.” EX: Victor’s desire to create a being with life can seem “selfless,” but his true wishes are clear when he states that he “deserves greater gratitude from his creation than a son gives his father.”

Other examples of his ambition are his habits he undertakes in creating the monster. He seems like a mad-scientist locked away from society, putting all his energy in creating this being. His “self-obsession” is clear when even he states that he wishes that his cares and affections towards his family were to completely subside until his creation is complete.

Blog post 5

Could Beowulf have fought so many beasts if he was disguised in armor? When evaluating Beowulf’s life and battles, it seems as though he had to always be the one in charge, the one to fight the beast, and the one to get the glory. Batman, from the movie The Dark Knight, seems to be quite the opposite. Batman, when he finally avenges his opponents, conceals his identity, does not get any fame, and is even considered a fugitive. They seem to be fairly opposite heroes, but when considering both heroes’ ego, they are the same person.

                Beowulf and Batman have contrary beliefs when it comes down to the conclusion of their acts, but when it comes down to the actual act, they are on the same page. In other words, both characters have the say in what goes and what does not. Both characters call the shots. In The Dark Knight, after Batman has succeeded in capturing the villainous Joker, his method of attaining information is cruel and Batman, even though the law enforcement discourages such acts, proceeds anyway. When Beowulf is in the act of capturing and killing his beasts, he has to be the honorable one and kill the beast himself, even though he has a dozen others to “help him.” Their egos even get them to the point where they have to quit being heroes. After Batman is “overwhelmed” with helping out his fellow Gotham crime fighters, he decides that he will no longer be in charge of incarcerating criminals, but rather the newly elected D.A, Harvey Dent. Of course, this backfires and Harvey Dent then becomes Two-Face. Same goes for Beowulf when he fails to kill Grendel’s mother. His ego fails him, like Batman and he decides that he is no longer a great hero and lives an old bitter life until he again kills the dragon.

                Another example of Batman’s and Beowulf’s egos is in their method of celebration. Batman is a multimillionaire, as I recall if not billionaire, who loves to live a lavish lifestyle. While he may not want to bring attention to himself through Batman, he nonetheless wants attention. At one point in the film, Bruce Wayne (Batman) is so sure of his influence on the city masses that he claims that one of his promoting parties for Harvey will ensure that he wins the election for the District Attorney position. In Beowulf, not only is there a feast for Beowulf’s defeat of Grendel, but another for his “defeat” of Grendel’s mother, whom he did not come to kill in the first place. Beowulf is praised by not only the townspeople, but by the King and ____ who claimed ridicule upon Beowulf’s arrival. Then as the story progressed, Beowulf becomes King of that town and grown to be an old man who still seems to be able to lead a fight against invading forces.

                Clearly, Batman and Beowulf have more similarities than they would want. Their egos are a sure identity of both. which have backfired for both. The only main difference is that Batman wants his ego seen through Bruce Wayne, while Beowulf wants his ego to be praised at all times. 

Etymology of Germanic Words

Proto-Germanic –   Mothaer  Fader      Unda            Ap (a)laz    Ahsian

Old English –         Moder      Faeder    Ond (and)    Aepel          Ascian

English –                Mother     Father    And              Apple          Ask

German –               Mutter      Vater      Und              Apfel          Fragen

Dutch –                  Moeder     Vader     En                Appel          Vragen

Danish –                 Moder       Far        OG                Aeble         Sporg

Swedish –               Mamma    Pappa    Och               Apple         Fragar  

Extended Blog Entry

Seeing that my favorite novels are ones which include dark themes about society and convoluted plots, it was only natural for me to be drawn to George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. I had not heard of this novel before the end of my junior year. The topic in my American English class was revolving around the idea of non-conformity, which always catches my attention, at the time when my friend mentioned Orwell’s book to me. As the senior year reading list came along, and I noticed that Orwell’s novel was in the list, I decided to give the book a chance.

Now that I have read the complete novel, I judge Nineteen Eighty-Four as, overall, an outstanding piece of literature. To begin, the imagery from start to finish is arguably as well as it gets. Orwell’s settings and characters are described in such a fashion that the reader can see the emotions on a character’s face, hear the surrounding noise in the setting, and even see the current state of the objects in the surroundings. The story takes place in “future” London where a dictatorial leadership has induced systematic regulation, poverty, and brainwashing. As one can see in the following passage, “He walked on. The bomb had demolished a group of houses 200 metres up the street. A black plume of smoke hung in the sky, and below it a cloud of plaster dust in which a crowd was already forming around the ruins. There was a little pile of plaster lying on the pavement ahead of him, and in the middle of it he could see a bright red streak. When he got up to it he saw that it was a human hand severed at the wrist. Apart from the bloody stump, the hand was so completely whitened as to resemble a plaster cast,” Orwell’s surroundings, though part of any novel, also convey emotions which the story could not go without.

In addition to the setting, the emotional attachment that one feels towards Orwell’s main character is easy to grasp. Winston Smith is the protagonist struggling to survive in Airstrip One, once called London, where every citizen is under complete and utter watch. Winston has lost all family members due to “Big Brother”, the dictatorship installed in Airstrip One, and seems to be one of few individuals who can, in his mind, single out “the party’s” evil lies. Winston constantly has to restrain himself from showing any sign of opposition towards the party. Orwell expresses Winston’s thoughts and emotions superbly; “Winston was gelatinous with fatigue. Gelatinous was the right word. It had come into his head spontaneously. His body seemed to have not only the weakness of a jelly, but its translucency. He felt that if he held up his hand he would be able to see the light through it. All the blood and lymph had been drained out of him by an enormous debauch of work, leaving only a frail structure of nerves, bones, and skin. All sensations seemed to be magnified. His overalls fretted his shoulders, the pavement tickled his feet, even the opening and closing of a hand was an effort that made his joints creak.”

As for the plot, Orwell selects a topic which any individual should be able to relate to directly or indirectly. The year is 1984 and the world has split off into three main superpowers; Oceania, Eurasia, and East Asia. Winston Smith lives in what was once London in a society where everybody is watched and expected to never question the government, Big Brother. Life is harsh with little food, little clothes, and having to always seem like everything is okay is mandatory. The plot definitely picks at themes like government control and conformity which most people can relate to. It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. “And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be REDUCED to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. Parsons swallowed it easily, with the stupidity of an animal. The eyeless creature at the other table swallowed it fanatically, passionately, with a furious desire to track down, denounce, and vaporize anyone who should suggest that last week the ration had been thirty grammes.” The last passage certainly picks at how easily people can be forced to believe a lie not a day later. Of course if they say anything, they would be killed. Orwell’s plot is definitely one to pull a reader into a world of destruction and fear, yet one can easily relate to the plot and emotions of the characters. 

Most Memorable Books #2

The most memorable books I can recall include The catcher In the Rye, The Jungle, The Killer Angels, Night, and, from when I was younger, the action series Alex Rider. To start off, the Anthony Horowitz's Alex Rider series was the first series of novels that had ever gotten my attention. When I first read Eagle Strike in the seventh grade, (I didn't initially read them in order) I was captured by the foreign and audacious adventures  of a teenage spy. I then had to read the rest of the series up until about two years ago. Night by Elie Wiesel was definitely a profound and powerful novel which seized my emotions. In US History last year, I luckily had the chance to get The Killer Angels under my belt. This novel is simply the epitome of a solid, well written piece of work. The vibrant, diverse characters makes one feel like they have traveled back in time and are being told the story of the civil war by the characters in person. The Jungle, by Upton Sinclair, was another work which helped me gain more knowledge of the American experience and American history. I have come to love the study of American history and to uncover the roots of our present country. The Jungle and The Killer Angels have certainly aided me in my search. And lastly there's The Catcher In the Rye. Sometimes I can see a bit of myself in Holden Caulfield. Some of these aspects I can be proud of and others I may not. But, all in all, The Catcher In the Rye, made me think more about the world around me and also made me ask myself if I was looking at the world in the right way, so The Catcher In the Rye was definitely a book I was not going to forget.

Excellent Storytelling

The last book I read, Along Came A Spider, was definitely one of my favorites. It was one of those stories  where I could not drop the book; I was hooked. I believe James Patterson elicited excellent story telling in this book. The plot of the book takes time to start but once it does, it does not slow down. This book is definitely a thriller that has many twists and mind games. I see that as a plus in a book because, like in a movie, the audience loves it when the author pulls a twist on them. Another reason this book has great story telling is that the book contains an array of colorful characters. From the main protagonist, Alex Cross, to the psychopath antagonist,  Soneji, the author definitely did a great job of hooking the reader with characters that entertain.